Magento Tops eCommerce Market Share – November 2010

Last month I looked at how many Magento sites I could find in the Alexa top 1 million. So that I had a benchmark to compare against I also looked for osCommerce installations.

This month, I’ve expanded the signature set to cover a wider range of popular eCommerce software/packages. Magento still takes the top spot, this month with 3414 sites – 150 more than last month. 77 of these sites were found to be using Magento Enterprise edition. 2nd place still goes to osCommerce with 3123, a touch less than last month. Following the leaders, although a considerable amount behind, is Zen Cart and then Volusion with 1556 and 889 respectively.

eCommerce Market Share

Volusion is often talked about as an alternative to Magento, but I only found a quarter as many Volusion stores. Volusion definitely have their eyes on potential Magento customers. When I Google search for Magento, I see ads for Volusion and Shopify. When following the Volusion link it leads to a page comparing Volusion with Magento (I use the term loosely). Even though Shopify also advertises, I was only able to find 122 stores in the top 1 million this month.

Magento - Google Sponsored Listings

Weighted Rankings

A limitation from the previous analysis was that a site that was in the top 100 was ‘worth’ the same as a site that was ranked 999,999th. Therefore, with the aim of being fairer to those sites that have earned the higher rank, I gave each site a weighting for the pie chart. I divided the 1 million ranks into 10 categories, each 100,000 wide. I then assigned 10 to the sites in the 1-100,000 category, 1 to the sites in the 900,000 to 1 million, and so on for the rest of the categories.

I then counted up the new ‘scores’ and produced an updated pie chart as you can see below. The largest eCommerce players are still there, i.e. Magento, osCommerce and Zencart but the lower players have moved around. All of these appear to be reasonably well distributed on average across the top million.

Weighted eCommerce Market Share

GSI Commerce performs interestingly. I only found 48 GSI Commerce stores, but from the weightings, it can be seen that most of these must be in the top 100,000 sites. Suggesting it’s a popular choice for the enterprise customer base. Indeed, sites include Toys R Us, NFLShop and Adidas.

Similarly, Mercent were relatively low in the table in terms of the number of sites detected. However, when the average rank category was looked at, it was found to be in the 100,000 to 200,000 segment. This would imply that the Mercent customer base is also skewed towards enterprise.

Results in Full

eCommerce PackageNumber of SitesWeighted Number of SitesAverage Rank Category
Magento341416728500,000 – 600,000
osCommerce312314585500,000 – 600,000
Zen Cart15567210500,000 – 600,000
Volusion8894288500,000 – 600,000
PrestaShop8523637500,000 – 600,000
X-Cart7333508500,000 – 600,000
Miva Merchant7103688400,000 – 500,000
Interspire6052799500,000 – 600,000
OpenCart3351542500,000 – 600,000
OXID eSales3101686400,000 – 500,000
Actinic2901218500,000 – 600,000
Shopify122520500,000 – 600,000
Mercent102823100,000 – 200,000
ekmPowershop71236600,000 – 700,000
nopCommerce52242500,000 – 600,000
GSI Commerce484541 – 100,000
Big Cartel28129500,000 – 600,000
TomatoCart1139600,000 – 700,000
LemonStand416600,000 – 700,000

With results like this, I know whom my money is on for favourite eCommerce application in the Packt Open Source Awards.

Methodology

There were a couple of questions posed to me last month about how I undertook this investigation. I’m not doing anything complicated for this. I don’t make any odd requests to sites to try and determine what they’re running by the response. I simply look at the index page and look for identifying features within the HTML. For example, I look at the JavaScript and CSS files that are used and the style of links.

Limitations

As detailed in my methodology, I’ll admit this is far from a comprehensive analysis, but I hope it’s a good indication of eCommerce stores in use.

When writing the signatures, I had to strike a balance so that I avoided false positives, but that I also detected as many eCommerce sites as possible. Another difficulty that I had during testing was that some stores had removed the identifying features of the particular software that I knew they were running. This is unavoidable but means that the numbers are not always as high as they should be.

Also, I’ve had to make the assumption that all stores are installed on the root of the domain or sub domain, which will not always be true for all eCommerce stores.

And Finally..

The software that I have looked at this month were mainly the eCommerce packages that first came to my head, but some were suggested to me. So if you have any particular ones that I’ve not included that you would be interested in me adding signatures for, share them in the comments or via twitter (@bobbyshaw).

I’ve undertaken some further analysis on the Magento sites, posts to follow in the coming weeks once I get time to write up my findings!

This entry was posted in eCommerce. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to Magento Tops eCommerce Market Share – November 2010

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Magento Tops eCommerce Market Share – November 2010 | Tom Robertshaw -- Topsy.com

  2. Pingback: Magento Tops eCommerce Market Share – November 2010 | Magento News

  3. Pingback: Magento Favicon: It’s lovely and all, but not on a live store please guys! | Magento News

  4. Pingback: The Most Popular Magento Locales | Magento News

  5. Pingback: At Last! More Magento Links – Fridays Top 5 Magento Picks | Magento Themed Templates

  6. Pingback: Magento Ausblick 2011 » Magento, Infos, Jahr, Connect, Dabei, Meet » ShopTrainer

  7. Interesting methodology and results. I’m interested in whether you saw any appreciable market share for Ubercart and Virtuemart, the two most popular e-commerce plugins for Drupal and Joomla, respectively.

  8. Tom Robertshaw says:

    Hi Steven. Thank you. I haven’t actually looked at either of those as of yet, however I will make a note to add signatures for these too in the next survey I run. This should be in February.

  9. Andy says:

    Hey Tom. Great job collecting and analyzing this data! What do you think about providing a toplist of installations for each eCommerce solution? (e.g. top 10 Alexa-ranked sites that use Magento/osCommerce). Best regards, Andy

  10. Tom Robertshaw says:

    Hi Andy. Thanks for the kind words. If that’s something that people would be interested in, then I can take a look. I’ll soon be running this survey again so I’ll look into having appendices with more data.

  11. Pingback: 6 Open Source Apps Your Web Host Should Offer - WebMaster View

  12. Jess says:

    Hi Guys, This data is not accurate at all. You need to be looking at tools which actually scan the web and analyse pages in detail.

    http://trends.builtwith.com/shop

    As you can see, the Magento distribution is not at all as high as described in this post.

  13. Tom Robertshaw says:

    Oh really? You’re commenting on an 20 month old post. Plus have you investigated the platforms that are included in trends.builtwith.com? The Find Upfront isnt an ecommerce platform the same way that magento is. In addition the source data is different in my analysis compare to Builtwith. So not directly compatible.

  14. Hi Tom – What about companies like Yahoo cart? Also do you do consulting? I am targeting multi-product retailers using any shopping cart with a new service that can increase profitable traffic and am working on building prospect lists. Email me or call me on my cell 619-708-7456.

    Thanks and all the best,
    Bob

  15. Tom Robertshaw says:

    Hi Bob,

    Please check out the more recent survey, posted last October – http://tomrobertshaw.net/2012/11/october-2012-ecommerce-survey/ You’ll find that includes even more ecommerce platforms.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>